MANNAFEST

Hebrew Roots · letter 22 of 22

Taw

The mark — the last letter, and in Ezekiel's own script it was drawn as a cross.

Sounds like

t / th

Its number

400

Its name means

taw

Final form

none

Taw is the end of the alphabet and the plainest sign in it: a mark. Not a picture of an object, a mark — the scratch you make on a thing to say it is spoken for. The name taw is still an ordinary Hebrew noun with exactly that meaning, and the Bible uses it as one.

That noun turns up in one of the strangest scenes in the prophets. In Ezekiel 9, a man with a writer's inkhorn is sent through Jerusalem to set a taw — a mark — on the foreheads of everyone who grieves over the city's sin, and the destroyers are told to pass those people by. And in the script Ezekiel's own scribes used, the letter taw was drawn as an ✕. That last sentence is an epigraphic fact about the shape of a letter. What Christians have made of it is a reading, it is very old, and it lives in the readings band below.

Hebrew also says “from aleph to taw” exactly the way English says “from A to Z.” That idiom is the doorway to this letter's most contested territory — the little untranslated word spelled aleph-taw — and this room handles it plainly before sending you to the full museum.

Where Scripture itself plays with this letter

Everything in this band is checkable — something the biblical text or the manuscripts that carry it demonstrably do with this letter.

The mark in Ezekiel 9

“Go through the midst of the city… and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry over all the abominations that are done in the midst thereof.” English Bibles say “a mark.” The Hebrew word is taw, this letter's own name.

In the paleo-Hebrew script of Ezekiel's day, that letter was written ✕. So the mark on the forehead was, as a matter of how the alphabet was drawn at the time, a cross-shape.

Keep the two claims apart. That the letter was shaped that way is a fact about handwriting, checkable against inscriptions in the ground. That the passage is about the cross is a reading — an ancient one with a long history, set out in the readings band and in the full Taw study behind the door below.

Aleph and taw — the little word that is never translated

There is a two-letter Hebrew word, ʾet, spelled aleph-taw, that English Bibles never translate. It is not being hidden: it is a piece of grammar. It sits in front of a definite noun to say “this next thing is what the verb is acting on.” English does that job with word order and needs no word for it at all.

Genesis 1:1 has two of them: God created ʾet the heavens and ʾet the earth. That is genuinely striking to see. It is also worth knowing the size of the field: this little word appears something like eleven thousand times in the Hebrew Bible, and it sits in front of perfectly ordinary nouns everywhere — including, twenty verses later, in front of “the great sea-creatures.”

The idiom underneath is real and lovely: Hebrew says “from aleph to taw” for the whole of a thing, the way English says A to Z. The devotional reading built on top of it — Alpha and Omega — is in the readings band, presented as what it is.

The last stanza of the longest chapter

Psalm 119's taw stanza is verses 169 to 176 — the end of a poem that has walked all twenty-two letters, eight verses each, one hundred and seventy-six verses about the word of God.

And it does not end in triumph. The last verse begins with this letter: taʿiti — “I have gone astray like a lost sheep; seek thy servant.”

The alphabet finishes. The psalmist admits he has not.

Words that begin here

How readers have meditated on this letter

What follows is devotional reading — meaning laid on top of the sign by readers who loved it, not a fact about what Hebrew words mean. It is carried here because it is old, beautiful, and genuinely part of how this letter has been received. It is kept behind this door so nobody mistakes it for grammar.

The cross seen in the marka devotional reading

Christian writers noticed Ezekiel's taw very early. Tertullian, writing around the turn of the third century, took the letter's shape in the older script as a foreshadowing of the cross set on the foreheads of the saved; Origen and Jerome both handle the same passage, and Jewish discussion of the mark in Ezekiel 9 is preserved in the Talmud as well.

The shape of the letter is a fact you can check against inscriptions. Reading Ezekiel's mark as a prefiguring of the cross is a reading — one with eighteen centuries behind it, made openly by people who said plainly what they were doing. Offered here as exactly that.

Read this way by: Tertullian, Against Marcion III.22 (public domain, Ante-Nicene Fathers vol. 3); the same passage is handled by Origen and Jerome, and discussed in b. Shabbat 55a

Alpha and Omegaa devotional reading

Revelation has Christ say “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end,” taking up Isaiah's “I am the first, and I am the last.” Readers in the Messianic and Hebrew-roots stream have long heard the untranslated Hebrew ʾet — aleph-taw, first letter and last — as the same signature standing quietly in the Hebrew text, present already at creation.

Here is the honest shape of it. Revelation is written in Greek and names Greek letters; there is no verbal borrowing from the Hebrew particle. And that particle appears about eleven thousand times, in front of fish and cattle and city walls, so any argument that its presence marks Christ has to account for the other ten thousand.

What remains, and it is not nothing: Hebrew genuinely uses “from aleph to taw” for the whole of a thing, and Greek genuinely uses alpha-to-omega the same way. The resonance is real as a completeness idiom and has a long history of interpretation. It is resonance, not a linguistic derivation — and the full case, for and against, is laid out in the Taw study.

Read this way by: The Messianic and Hebrew-roots devotional stream, including Chuck Missler (Cosmic Codes; Learn the Bible in 24 Hours) — cited, not quoted; the texts are Revelation 1:8 with Isaiah 44:6

Where this letter leads

Sources: Alan H. Gardiner, “The Egyptian Origin of the Semitic Alphabet,” Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 3 (1916) · Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, ed. Kautzsch, tr. Cowley (Oxford, 1910), §5 · Brown-Driver-Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (1906), s.v. taw and s.v. ʾet · C. D. Ginsburg, Introduction to the Massoretico-Critical Edition of the Hebrew Bible (London, 1897) · Tertullian, Against Marcion III.22 (Ante-Nicene Fathers vol. 3, public domain) · Chuck Missler, Cosmic Codes; Learn the Bible in 24 Hours — cited, not quoted · C. H. Spurgeon, The Treasury of David, on Psalm 119:169-176 Every cited work — the sources registry →