MANNAFEST

Two detective stories against idols · Greek addition to Daniel, c. 2nd-1st century BC

Bel and the Dragon

Daniel proves that a god who eats dinner every night has priests with a trapdoor.

Original language: Greek (Susanna and Bel originally); Hebrew/Aramaic substrate for Prayer of Azariah

King James Version Apocrypha (1769 standardized text) · public domain

Read Bel and the Dragon

King James Version + Apocrypha (standardized 1769 text), eBible.org USFX edition of the Crosswire/eBible KJV — Public Domain — One of the three Additions to Daniel.

Plain answers first

What this book is

Bel and the Dragon is a single chapter attached to the Greek Daniel, printed in some Bibles as Daniel chapter 14. It holds two short stories and a third scene, all making one point: the gods of Babylon are not alive.

In the first, the king asks Daniel why he will not worship Bel, since the idol clearly eats the food set before it every night. Daniel says it is clay and brass and has never eaten anything. The temple is sealed, but Daniel quietly scatters ashes across the floor. In the morning the food is gone, the seal is intact, and the ashes are covered with the footprints of the priests, their wives, and their children, who have been coming in through a hidden door.

In the second, the king points to a living serpent, or dragon, that the Babylonians worship, and asks whether Daniel can call that one lifeless. Daniel asks permission and kills it without a sword, feeding it cakes made of pitch, fat, and hair until it bursts.

The crowd turns on Daniel and he is thrown to lions again, this time for six days. In the middle of it, the prophet Habakkuk is carrying stew to reapers in Judea when an angel lifts him by the hair and sets him down in Babylon to feed Daniel, then carries him home.

The piece is usually dated to the second or first century BC and comes to us in Greek.

The canon question, honestly

Why it stands outside the 66

This chapter is not in the Hebrew and Aramaic Daniel. It survives only in the Greek versions, and Jerome again marked it as absent from the Hebrew when he included it in Latin. The Reformers moved it to the apocrypha with the other additions. Rome affirmed it at Trent, and Orthodox churches read it. Christians have also long noticed that its tone is different from the rest of Daniel: it is broader, more playful, closer to folk tale than to the visions of Daniel 7-12. That difference is part of why the church's judgment about it went the way it did.

Why a student of the 66 should still open it

Why read it — and how

Why read it

This is Isaiah 44 and Jeremiah 10 turned into a story a child can follow. Those chapters argue that a man cuts a tree, burns half of it for warmth, and bows to the other half. Bel and the Dragon simply shows it, and lets you laugh. Behind the humor is the same claim that runs through the whole Bible: the living God is not fed by us, does not depend on us, and cannot be handled. It also preserves an early tradition of Habakkuk as a prophet with a story attached, which is worth knowing when you read his book.

How to read it

One chapter, one sitting. Read Isaiah 44:9-20 first so you can hear what the story is dramatizing. Read it lightly, the way it was written. And keep the frame straight: it is a witness to how Jews under foreign rule mocked idolatry and kept their nerve, not an addition to the historical record of Daniel's life.

Doors into the text

Key moments

The disagreement is old — here it is plainly

Where the traditions stand

TraditionWhere this book stands
jewishnot canonical; Hebrew original (if any) lost
anglicanapocryphal — read for example of life and instruction of manners
catholiccanonical (deuterocanonical; Daniel 3, 13, 14 in Vulgate)
protestantnon-canonical; retained in Luther's 1534 Apocrypha
eastern orthodoxcanonical (anagignoskomena)
oriental orthodoxcanonical