The inscription is in situ in Corinth's theatre plaza: a named magistrate, a named office, a self-funded pavement, cut in the mid-first century AD.
Named Figures
The Erastus Inscription at Corinth
A limestone paving block still lying in the square beside the theatre at Corinth reads ERASTVS PRO AEDILIT[AT]E S P STRAVIT — "Erastus laid this pavement at his own expense in return for his aedileship." It was cut in the middle of the first century, the years Paul wrote Romans from Corinth and sent greetings from "Erastus the treasurer of the city."
high confidenceArchaeological
THE CLAIM
It was cut in the middle of the first century
- 1The inscription is in situArtifact
- 2Romans 16The record
- 3John GoodrichThe record
- 4Erastus appears twice moreThe record
- 5A Roman aedileship was electiveThe record
WHERE IT STANDS
Firmly established
high confidence
THE PAVEMENT'S OWN WORDS
Corinth, mid-first century
ERASTVS PRO AEDILIT[AT]E S(VA) P(ECVNIA) STRAVIT
“Erastus, in return for his aedileship, laid this pavement at his own expense.”
Ordinary Roman civic practice: a man elected to magistracy repaid the city with a public benefaction and put his name on it. Streets and squares were the aedile's department.
THE TEXT IT MEETS
Romans 16:23
“Gaius my host, and of the whole church, saluteth you. Erastus the treasurer of the city saluteth you, and Quartus the brother.”
Paul's Greek is ho oikonomos tēs poleōs — the city's steward, its financial officer. On Goodrich's reading Paul greets him in the office below, and the pavement records the office he won afterward.
The span, dated
44 BC
Corinth is refounded as a Roman colony
Julius Caesar settles the ruined city with freedmen and veterans: Latin as the official language, aediles among the magistrates. Hence the Latin names in Romans 16.
mid-1st c. AD
The pavement is laid
A grey-pink limestone block five feet long, cut for bronze letters six inches tall, set in the square northeast of the theatre. Dated by letter forms and the square's stratigraphy.
c. AD 56
Paul writes Romans from Corinth
Romans 16:23 sends greetings from “Erastus the treasurer of the city.” He appears twice more: Acts 19:22 and 2 Timothy 4:20.
1929
T. L. Shear uncovers the block
The American School of Classical Studies reports it in the American Journal of Archaeology that season. The bronze was stripped long ago; the cuttings and the lead in the sockets remain.
2010
The argument, both ways
Steven Friesen (“The Wrong Erastus,” in Corinth in Context) argues for a later, different man; John Goodrich answers in New Testament Studies that oikonomos in an Achaean colony renders the Latin quaestor — the office below the aedileship.
Today
Still in the open air
The stone lies where Shear found it, in the pavement beside the theatre at ancient Corinth. The debate turns on how common the name was and how tightly the pavement can be dated.
THE EVIDENCE
The stone
Northeast of the theatre at ancient Corinth, set in the pavement of a public square, lies a block of grey-pink limestone about five feet long and twenty-one inches high. Its face carries cuttings for bronze letters roughly six inches tall, with traces of the lead that anchored them still in the sockets.
The bronze was stripped long ago. The cuttings are perfectly legible. T. L. Shear of the American School of Classical Studies uncovered the block in the 1929 season and reported it in the American Journal of Archaeology that year.
It is still there, in the open air, where he found it.
THE EVIDENCE
What it says
Restored, it reads: ERASTVS PRO AEDILIT[AT]E S(VA) P(ECVNIA) STRAVIT — "Erastus, in return for his aedileship, laid this pavement at his own expense."
This was ordinary Roman civic practice. A man elected to magistracy repaid the city with a public benefaction and put his name on it. The aedile of a Roman colony had charge of streets, markets and public buildings; paving the square outside the theatre was precisely his department.
The city
One oddity explains itself here. Corinth was Greek, but the inscription is Latin, because Julius Caesar refounded the ruined city in 44 BC as a Roman colony — Colonia Laus Iulia Corinthiensis — settled with freedmen and veterans, governed on the Roman municipal pattern, with Latin as its official language and aediles among its magistrates.
That is also why so many of Paul's Corinthian contacts carry Latin names: Gaius, Crispus, Fortunatus, Quartus, Tertius, Justus. The name-list in Romans 16 reads like the population of a Roman colony, because that is what Corinth was.
What paul wrote
Romans 16:23, written from Corinth: "Erastus the treasurer of the city saluteth you." Paul's Greek is ho oikonomos tēs poleōs — the city's steward, its financial officer.
Erastus appears twice more. Paul sends him with Timothy into Macedonia (Acts 19:22). And in the last letter, a note in passing: "Erastus remained at Corinth" (2 Timothy 4:20).
A Corinthian believer holding a named municipal financial office is exactly the man Paul describes.
The fit
John Goodrich argued in New Testament Studies (2010) that oikonomos in an Achaean colony renders the Latin quaestor — the city's treasury magistrate, a post of real rank. In the Roman ladder a man served as quaestor and could then stand for the aedileship.
On that reading Paul greets Erastus in the office below, and the pavement records the office he won afterward. The chronology fits without strain: the letter forms and the square's stratigraphy place the inscription in the middle of the first century.
Why it matters
Paul's letters are full of ordinary names — Phoebe, Gaius, Quartus, Tertius. Critics have long read the Pauline house churches as socially marginal and their name lists as unverifiable.
Here one of those names appears to have paid for a public square, in the city Paul names, in the decade Paul was there, in the kind of office Paul assigns him. The letter's world and the excavated city touch at a point you can stand on.
WHERE IT STANDS
Where scholarship stands
The identification is contested, and honestly so. Steven Friesen ("The Wrong Erastus," in Corinth in Context, Brill 2010) argues the pavement belongs to a later, different Erastus, and that Paul's oikonomos was more likely a public slave of modest standing. Alexander Weiss disputed that the colony of Corinth even had a municipal quaestorship.
Goodrich and Andrew Clarke (Secular and Christian Leadership in Corinth, 1993) defend the identification. The debate turns on two measurable things: how common the name Erastus actually was in Roman Corinth — attested, but not frequent — and how tightly the pavement can be dated, which is by context rather than by any date on the stone.
5 pieces of evidence
What this establishes
- 01Artifact
- 02The record
Romans 16:23, written from Corinth in that same window, greets "Erastus the oikonomos of the city."
- 03The record
John Goodrich (New Testament Studies, 2010) identifies oikonomos with the Latin quaestor — an office a man held before standing for aedile, so both texts can describe one career.
- 04The record
Erastus appears twice more in the New Testament, always tied to Corinth and Paul's circle (Acts 19:22; 2 Timothy 4:20).
- 05The record
A Roman aedileship was elective and expensive, so the stone documents a wealthy Corinthian — evidence that Paul's churches reached the civic elite, not only the poor.
6 passages
Key verses
Berean Standard Bible
“Gaius, who has hosted me and all the church, sends you greetings. Erastus, the city treasurer, sends you greetings, as does our brother Quartus.”
Romans 16:23
“He sent two of his helpers, Timothy and Erastus, to Macedonia, while he stayed for a time in the province of Asia.”
Acts 19:22
“Erastus has remained at Corinth, and Trophimus I left sick in Miletus.”
2 Timothy 4:20
“I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant of the church in Cenchrea.”
Romans 16:1-2
“Brothers, consider the time of your calling: Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were powerful; not many were of noble birth.”
1 Corinthians 1:26
“Crispus, the synagogue leader, and his whole household believed in the Lord. And many of the Corinthians who heard the message believed and were baptized.”
Acts 18:8
THE RECEIPTS
Sources
- T. Leslie Shear, Excavations in the Theatre District and Tombs of Corinth in 1929 (American Journal of Archaeology 33, 1929)
- Henry J. Cadbury, Erastus of Corinth (Journal of Biblical Literature 50, 42-58, 1931)
- David W. J. Gill, Erastus the Aedile (Tyndale Bulletin 40, 293-301, 1989)
- John K. Goodrich, Erastus, Quaestor of Corinth: The Administrative Rank of ho oikonomos tes poleos (Rom 16.23) in an Achaean Colony (New Testament Studies 56, 90-115, 2010)
- Steven J. Friesen, The Wrong Erastus: Ideology, Archaeology, and Exegesis (Corinth in Context (Brill), 2010)
- John Harvey Kent, Corinth VIII.3: The Inscriptions 1926-1950, no. 232 (American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1966)
◈Contested pointscontested
- The stone gives a name and an office. It does not say "Christian," and it does not say oikonomos. Joining the two Erastuses is an inference.
- Steven Friesen ("The Wrong Erastus," 2010) argues the pavement dates after Paul's time and that Paul's oikonomos was probably a public slave — a household position, not a magistracy.
- Alexander Weiss questioned whether the colony of Corinth had a municipal quaestorship at all, which would undercut the career reconstruction that makes the two offices compatible.
- Erastus is attested elsewhere in Greek epigraphy; the name alone cannot carry the identification, and the pavement is dated by archaeological context rather than by an internal date.
