Registry of contested ELS/Torah-code claims. Document, never adjudicate. Every entry pairs claim + strongest refutation. Connections are DOCUMENTATION anchors into contested drawers, never endorsed connection rows. Hays rubric does not apply to statistical ELS claims (category error); it applies only to the one interpretive entry (Genesis-5 name-meanings).
- **verse:gen.1.1** — WRR 1994 famous-rabbis experiment ran on Genesis (Koren text), p approx 1/62,500; anchors Genesis to the registry entry with the MBBK 1999 refutation and Aumann 2004 committee. Documentation, not endorsement. _(source: Witztum, Rips, Rosenberg, Statistical Science 9(3):429-438 (1994); McKay et al., Statistical Science 14(2):150-173 (1999))_
- **verse:gen.1.1** — Weissmandl: every 50th letter from the first taw of Genesis spells TORH, with a parallel 50-interval TORH near the start of Exodus. A historically real OBSERVATION, never proof; short-word ELSs are mathematically trivial. _(source: Weissmandl (posthumous); Chabad, 'The Purim Code')_
- **verse:isa.53.1** — Rambsel (1996) and Jeffrey (1996) claimed a Yeshua ELS cluster in Isaiah 53; anchors Isaiah 53 to the registry entry pairing the claim with Thomas 1997 and Ingermanson 1999 (the 4-letter string is dense everywhere; no evidential weight). Documentation, not endorsement. _(source: David E. Thomas, Skeptical Inquirer 21(6) (1997); Randall Ingermanson, Who Wrote the Bible Code? (1999))_
- **verse:deu.1.1** — Drosnin's flagship 'Yitzhak Rabin' assassination grid is drawn from the Torah's Deuteronomy stretch; anchors it to the registry entry with Rips's public repudiation of Drosnin and McKay's Moby Dick control grids. Anchored to the book, not a pinned verse, to avoid asserting an unverified coordinate. _(source: Michael Drosnin, The Bible Code (Simon & Schuster, 1997); McKay, users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/dilugim/moby.html)_
- **verse:rev.13.18** — CONTRAST ANCHOR (Tier A). 666 = Nero Caesar (nrwn qsr); 616 variant (P115, known to Irenaeus) = nrw qsr; one solution explains both readings, majority academic view. Authorial, INVITED gematria ('let him calculate') - the foil that lets the reader feel how different the Tier-B ELS claims are. _(source: Bauckham, The Climax of Prophecy (1993); P115 (Oxyrhynchus); Luther Seminary faculty article on 616)_
- **verse:psa.119.1** — CONTRAST ANCHOR (Tier A). Psalm 119's 22x8 alphabetic acrostic is a pattern you can SEE - verifiable by any reader with an alphabet, no statistics, plainly authorial. The 'see vs persuade' teaching line hangs on placing this beside the ELS entries. _(source: The text itself; Tyndale House, 'The ABCs of Hebrew Acrostic Poems')_
- **verse:psa.145.13** — CONTRAST ANCHOR (Tier A) + text-criticism showcase. Masoretic Psalm 145 skips the nun verse; 11QPsa (Dead Sea Scrolls), LXX, and Syriac supply it - a REAL letter-pattern with a live manuscript story, the honest counterpoint to invisible-until-an-algorithm ELS claims. _(source: 11QPsa; Seforim Blog, 'The Missing Nun Verse in Ashrei')_
- **verse:gen.5.1** — Missler's 'gospel in the genealogy' (Adam-to-Noah name-meanings read as a redemption sentence). An INTERPRETIVE reading, so it takes a Hays note (unlike the statistical ELS entries): availability yes, volume low, history-of-interpretation modern not ancient, satisfaction undercut by disputed glosses (Methuselah, Mahalalel, Jared). Present as devotional observation with etymological caveats visible. _(source: Missler, Cosmic Codes (cite-only); standard Hebrew lexica for the contested glosses)_
The critique, at full strength
Critiques documented per entry in the lens brief (both Statistical Science papers, Allis 1944, Faulkner 1998/2013, edition-sensitivity data) — see the atlas brief; refine per-claim entries in the editor.
Full registry →