THE CLAIM
John 9:7 records Jesus sending a blind man to wash in the Pool of Siloam. For most of the twentieth century, the Byzantine-era pool at the end of Hezekiah's Tunnel was the only known candidate. In 2004 a much larger, earlier pool was uncovered in Jerusalem dated to the Second Temple period.
THE EVIDENCE
In June 2004, during municipal sewer repair south of the Temple Mount, stepped monumental pools built of dressed ashlar stones were exposed. Excavations directed by Ronny Reich and Eli Shukron (Israel Antiquities Authority) documented three tiers of steps and an edge of the pool measuring approximately 70 metres. Coins of Alexander Jannaeus (late 2nd-early 1st century BCE) were recovered embedded in the plaster, and coins from the First Jewish Revolt (66-70 CE) in the sediment - bracketing the pool's active use through the Second Temple era (Reich & Shukron, "The Pool of Siloam," Biblical Archaeology Review 31:5, 2005; Reich, Excavating the City of David, IAA, 2011).
THE STRONGEST OPPOSING VIEW
Skeptical readers note that the identification of the 2004 pool with the specific "Pool of Siloam" of John 9:7 is inferential - no inscription names it. Multiple pools in the Tyropoeon/Siloam system operated concurrently, and the Gospel narrative could in principle refer to another basin. Critics also correctly observe that archaeological confirmation of a location does not by itself confirm the miracle reported in the text.
THE APOLOGETIC RESPONSE
Urban C. von Wahlde ("The Pool of Siloam: The Importance of the New Discoveries for Our Understanding of Ritual Immersion in Late Second Temple Judaism and the Gospel of John," in Jesus and Archaeology, ed. James H. Charlesworth, Eerdmans, 2006) argues the 2004 pool matches the Gospel's "Siloam" in date, scale, and location better than any alternative: it is the only Second Temple-period stepped pool found at the terminus of Hezekiah's Tunnel, where the fed reservoir ends. John 9:7 gives a specific topographical cue ("sent"; Hebrew Shiloah = the conduit) that fits the uncovered installation.
OPEN QUESTIONS
Full excavation has been limited by property and political constraints; only a portion of the pool has been exposed. The precise function (ritual purification, general water supply, or both) remains debated.
FURTHER READING
Ronny Reich & Eli Shukron, "The Pool of Siloam," Biblical Archaeology Review 31:5 (2005). James H. Charlesworth (ed.), Jesus and Archaeology, Eerdmans, 2006. Ronny Reich, Excavating the City of David, Israel Antiquities Authority, 2011.
FOUNDER'S COMMENTARY
[founder: write here]